SPYROS FIDAS

IconINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CORPORATE & SECURITY CHRONICLES

IT Infrastructure departments resist to change. Is it time for a change?


The fundamental functions of IT departments are Infrastructure and Development.
It is really interesting who different they tend to approach business reality and future needs.

Development is based on constant change while Infrastructure resides on keeping things as they are.

An IT Infrastructure department must first of all handles assets and maintenance costs. For any new technology acquired, ROI is the most crucial factor, therefore if approved will stay for a long time. More than that, network security is improved when knowledge and expirience of the team is increased.

But in house supporting/implementation era is over. Outsourcing and managed services are the now and future. You no longer acquire hardware and annual maintenance packs but lease solutions.
Quality of support services depends not on training but on procurement. All you have to do is a good deal with correct metrics (SLA).
The last frontier - users - just a few years ago, were proud of the corporate internet access speed, now only complain when they have to compare their home PC, laptop or even netbook with their corporate workstation. "Well, that machine every day is installing patches and scans for viruses! Don't you IT guys have anything else to do?"

IT Development can teach a lot on how future Infrastructure departments may be (Development must learn also from Infrstructure - handle security and exploit resources instead of changing everything everytime).
Why having a Network Engineer and not a Network Consultant that focuses on preparing the network structure to include future needs.

Simply, don't run IT as a business, run it in a business like way.

 
 

What IT can learn from 'Employee-Owned Smartphones' model?



The current trend in organizations is to allow employee-owned smartphones to be connected to corporate infrastructure. But what are the benefits and obstacles to apply such a model for user's laptops?


Employee-owned smartphones model is growing because:
  • Smartphones life-cycle is extremely small (less than 2years), so assets fail to depreciate.
  • State of the art technology desire is moved from IT to the employee.
  • Central policy and encryption to these devices can be applied.
Also, a very popular model is to fund a base amount and employees pay (and therefore own) any additional fee for every mobile device they choose.

But how about organizations, instead of purchasing laptops, have their employees to own them?
Employees are granted an amount for every period of 2 or 3 years (amount varies for different positions and levels). They are allowed to choose only from a specific list of products and suppliers (agreed prices). Users can acquire any "dream" model but they have to pay the difference or can stay to the base model. Hardware belongs to employees, but usage of it subjects to corporate policy.

All reasons mentioned for smartphones fully apply. In simple words, less effort for IT, more happy users and an excited CFO.